co-incidence

What a coincidence -- according to to day's post over at The Writer's Almanac , today is the day that Moby Dick was first published -- to no acclaim whatsoever. A "damp drizzly November in my soul" and a case of a prophet being without honor in his own country indeed.

I was thinking a lot about the book today. My friend Denise and I went to the Dia in Beacon -- and it was glorious. But also very, very white. Rooms full of extremely ascetic paintings by Robert Ryman -- white paintings on white walls, which are purely about the paint itself and the painting's relationship to & with the wall (or other supports). Years ago, I saw an exhibition of his paintings in San Francisco and was so baffled I asked the guard if the paintings had been hung. What a difference two decades makes in my willingness to understand. I was very enthusiastic about the paintings but was interested to find that the longer I spent in the room, the more unsettled I was becoming by All That White. And I wondered if the oft-quoted line in MD "It was the whiteness of the whale that appalled me" has as much to do with the epic size of the whale as with its unnatural color.

But the most transcendent thing in the museum, I think, is Richard Serra's Torqued Ellipses -- four huge vessels (as Denise calls them) in a room only just big enough to contain them that have profound mythic, shamanic presence. From the website: " in these works space shifts and moves in wholly unpredictable and unprecedented ways: so destabilizing yet so beguiling is this sensation of movement that the spectator quickly gets caught up in an exploration of extended duration." Walking around and into these works was like walking into the womb of the time-- disorienting, then exalting.

Then there were several -- I don't know what to call them -- pieces? works? by Fred Sandback who is probably at the most extreme edge of minimalism. The works are simply outlines formed by tautly strung acrylic yarn. They create the illusion of glass panels, but there is literally nothing there.

About Sandback, also from the museum's website: "The first sculpture I made with a piece of string and a little wire was the outline of a rectangular solid . . . lying on the floor. It was a casual act, but it seemed to open up a lot of possibilities for me," Fred Sandback wrote in 1986, looking back over twenty years of activity to a seminal sculpture he had executed in 1966. The key implications of that determining impulse remain at the heart of his practice today. In wanting to create sculpture that did not have an inside, he found through this seemingly "casual act" the means to "assert a certain place or volume in its full materiality without occupying and obscuring it."

This experience of looking at something that was simultaneously there and not there was really delightful. I thought pieces were very playful. I used to not like being played with in this way, but I hope that as my understanding and appreciation of the goals of artists that I found and find challenging grows, that I will continue to be less troubled by the feeling that I'm being had in some nefarious and mean-spirited way and be more genuinely engaged.

It was a wonderful day -- lots to think about, much inspiration, and a good time with a good friend.