Wednesday, July 7, 2010

as I was saying

Remember that the blog has been languishing since -- eek! -- April. Check.

Think that it might be well to get started again, howsoever modestly. Check.

Remember how to sign in. Check.

Sign in on the sly while my collaborator is gone walkabout (shh, don't tell Stella . . . yet) in this heat. Check.

Post a recent work from her String Theory series because when she finds out I've been blogging without her there will be sulking. And in this heat.

Realize that it has taken way too long to remember how to do this, but then it was never one of those so-called intuitive processes in the first place. Check.

Consider announcing that I've quit my job and that before looking for another, I plan to finish a draft of the novel I've wanted to write since I was 14. Not this particular novel since I was 14, but a novel since I was 14. [check?]

Mention that I have been collecting a huge pile o' fabric in anticipation of taking a class during the week of the 18th with Nancy Crow who is some kind of genius and who requires this. Promise "more about this later." Check.

That's probably enough for now.
Did I mention that it's hot?

Check.

Saturday, April 24, 2010

habeas corpus

I was at the Morgan Library today to see one of the 17 surviving original manuscripts of the Magna Carter. Reportedly, because each copy bears the royal seal, they're technically not copies, but "engrossments." Live and learn.

It's surprisingly small -- about 15 x 18 inches. It's closely written in a fair hand, maybe 42 lines of script. The ink is brown -- probably turned brown over time. It's been a long time, almost 800 years. It's in Latin. Of course it would be.

This particular manuscript had never been out of England before. It was brought over from Oxford to be part of a special event for the university and was -- yes, really -- grounded by the Icelandic ash crisis. So the university called the library and offered it for display while new arrangements are made to return it to the Bodleian. It will be at the Morgan until May 30th. If you're in the neighborhood, stop by and give thanks.

Welcome to America, keystone document of democracy. And thank you.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Question 9

I read an article in the Daily News (4/14) about the Census and Question 9. It was in the New York Viva section so I'm going out on a limb and assuming that the author --Dolores Prida -- self-identifies as Hispanic/Latina. She urged Latinos to complete Question 9, despite whatever anxiety, confusion, or misgivings they may have, and send in the form.

For those of you who don't know, for the census, after establishing that you are "Person 1," and answering some innocuous questions, you get to Question 9 (of 10). Question 9 asks: "What is Person 1's race?" The first option is "White." The next is "Black, African Am, or Negro." Next is American Indian or Alaska Native" with a row of boxes in which you are to declare your "enrolled tribe." Then follows a variety of Asian heritages including Asian Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, Other Asian. Then a range of Pacific Islander options -- Native Hawaiian, Guamanian or Chamorro, Samoan, and Other Pacific Islander. For these "other" categories, in case you're unsure of what you are, the form offers suggestions: Hmong, Laotian, Fijian, Tongan and, in both cases, "and so on." I wonder how many people declare their tribe as "and so on." I was tempted. But since so many people have genealogical feet in many camps, Ms. Prida suggested in her article that "mixed" should be added to the mix.

Anyone who looked at me would say "unquestionably white," But I also had a problem with this question. I don't know much about my genealogy. It's entirely possibly that I'm 2% or 20% or some greater or lesser perc ent "other" if "other" means "other than white." And I object to classifying people by their appearance, even if a person's appearance seems to suggest a specific ethnic/racial/cultural/national heritage, perhaps especially if that is the case.

I doubt my appearance suggests that I grew up in a black neighborhood and was one of maybe half a dozen so-called white kids in my class at school. I sometimes look at old class portraits and think Let's play "Find the Minority." I doubt anyone would leap to the fact that some of my family is in Zimbabwe. Does that make me African American?

My appearance is more likely to suggest Northern European heritage. I have red hair so it's often assumed that I "am" Irish. I've never been to Ireland. As far as I know, no one in my family has been to Ireland in several generations. Red hair = Irish. Except that Scotland has the highest percentage of redheads per capita of any country in the world. So far as I know, no one in my family hails from Scotland, and anyway red hair =Irish. Everybody knows that.

Then there's my great grandfather (mother's side) who was Lithuanian, or maybe Polish. He was actually from the old country, but whether he was from the part of Lithuania that started out as Poland, then became Lithuania, then became Poland again or from someplace in that part of the world that held fast as"Lithuania" I don't know. Toss in some of the other "hails from" in my background and you get an unwieldy string of hyphens: Irish-Welsh-Polish/Lithuanian-German-American (except that, late in his life my father replaced German with English, I think because he had written to a "Find Your Family Crest" site in the back of magazine and that's what they told him. And having paid $39.95, who could argue?). Are the Welsh and the Germans sufficiently alike to constitute a race? Would Ms. Prida say my combined heritage constitutes "mixed race"? Is it a purely biochemical categorization, or does culture or national identity play a role? And what does "white" mean anyway? If someone knows that I am "white" what is they actually know about me?

I don't know why this matters so very much. I grew up in a black neighborhood, so my friends were black. My brother was less sanguine about this situation and sometimes called me a nigger-lover. It was a long time before I realized this was supposed to be insulting and/or cautionary. Aren't we supposed to love one another? Isn't that the whole point of living?

According the census site, a question like Question 9 has been asked on the census since 1790. More recently than the 18th century, it is intended to help monitor compliance with the Voting Rights and Civil Rights acts, to assess fairness of employment practices, and to plan and obtain funds for public services. These are good things -- fairness, civility, service, voting. But must they be allotted according to how you look? Irish-Welsh-Polish/Lithuanian-German-Americans are under-reported and therefore under-represented. I should start a movement. And yes I know that this is not how the world is. The fact is we do judge, characterize, and allot based on how people look. I guess my question is: why have we not moved further along the path of humanity from the 18th century? Why is the government still asking this question as a form of barter?

So I -- who am usually the whitest person in any room -- being Person 1, checked "other" and wrote in "human." I expect that a Census worker will come to the door to clarify the answer, but as best as I can understand it, it's the only answer that makes any authentic sense.

[note: thanks to wee Davey over there in Scotland, for the encouragement to start up again.
and for her fans -- as she often does, Stella has gone walkabout. I imagine she's working on something Goldworthy now that the weather has gone all balmy.]

Saturday, March 6, 2010

hiatus

A quick note after a long time to say that it will probably be another little or, perhaps, long while before I post again.

I'm up to the part I find most difficult in the first year of grieving -- where enough of normal life has resumed that I sometimes forget that my mother has passed and then remember again. And there is the looming anniversary of the sharp eruption of her illness (April 23) and passing (May 13) to get through.

Work is crazy-busy, which is both difficult and a mercy.

But it all raises questions of whither and wherefore, and fatigue, sadness, and existential angst are consuming but not the most appealing blog content.

So I will stay inward for a while and see what arises.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

working the 'just one cow' theory and a squib from Stella

I’ve been having a lot of trouble getting going again since my Mom passed. But I’m trying, trying, trying to get back into making some things. On the “just one cow” principle and with an eye toward the now-annual show that my First Thursday group prepares, I’m fussing with sketches. A deadline focuses the mind wonderfully. Vivien at Seven Pines Designs deserves credit for the inspiration. She sent around a note with a theme-and-variations exercise that seemed easy enough to support easing back into it. So I made some doodles based on a picture of a bird (from memory, I didn't find the picture until a couple of days later):

I thought these might have some potential -- and was interested to see serendipity had led to having some of the lines almost align:

I thought I could use the sketches as source images for a small triptych and embed the triptych in a larger background for the exhibition piece. I put traced copies down, shuffled them about, and had a few looks. The bright yellow background is a cut-up file folder I was using to estimate the final scale.
Then I set it aside to look at again tomorrow as I brought home a boatload of work from the office this weekend and sincerely want to get at least some of it underway. Ah! well, the things we do for health insurance.

Stella: you’re not blogging without me, are you??!!?

Melanie: I thought you were sleeping.
Stella: i’m not. and anyway, you were gonna let me sleep through it?
Melanie: You had a big day yesterday with your first visit to the vet.
Stella: first! i have to do that again?
Melanie: Not right away.
Stella: he stuck needles in me and poked my ears.
Melanie: Yes, and I paid him to do that.
Stella: you didn’t.
Melanie: I did.
Stella: i hate you now.
Melanie: You don’t. You have a lovely professional manicure.
Stella: i do. wait, don’t change the subject.
Melanie: I’m not changing the subject, I'm returning to the subject. You have your pictures ready?
Stella: i’m only gonna do one.
Melanie: Sulking is unattractive.
Stella: not sulking.
Melanie: Are too
Stella: am not. your camera is stupid and i could only get one good one.
Melanie: All right then, let’s what you’ve got.

Melanie Another triumph. What do you call it?
Stella: Shadow Mandala with Carpet Square.
Melanie Very evocative.
Stella: i know. i’m gonna sleep now.
Melanie: That’ll be different.
Stella: i heard that.
Melanie: You were meant to.
Stella: i hate you now.
Melanie: You don’t.
Stella: i know. but i’m still gonna sleep now.

Friday, January 8, 2010

Stella asked:
can i have a blog?

And I said: A blog?

Stella: estorbo has a blog.

Melanie: Well, yes, but—

Stella: and all the cats in wales have a blog.

Melanie: It's not all the cats in Wales—

Stella: even australian cats have a blog.

Melanie: Yes, I know . . .

Stella: so why can't i have a blog?

Melanie: I didn't say you couldn't have a --

Stella: then i can?

Melanie: What would it be about?

Stella: what would it be about? my art, of course.

Melanie You know about art?

Stella: i’ve been studying.

Melanie: So I see. You know the book is up side down?

Stella: just the part with the words.

Melanie: Indeed.

Stella: so can i?

Melanie: Have you made some art?

Stella: of course.

Melanie: May I see?

Stella: this is Still, Life. with Tissue Paper in Shoe Box on Painted and Lacquered Floor.

Melanie: Lovely. So you’ve given up your fiber work?

Stella: no, i’m still exploring ribbon . . .


. . . but I think paper may be my medium. i have a series.

Melanie: Really? A series?

Stella: it’s a series of epiphinnies.

Melanie: Epiphany is a big word for such a little cat.

Stella: i said i’ve been studying.

Melanie: So you did. My apologies.
. . .

Melanie: Well?

Stella: what?

Melanie: The series?

Stella: this is Pass(eD) words: Epiphany I

Stella: and II

Stella: and III

Stella: and IV


Melanie: You’ve been busy.

Stella: i have.

Melanie: They're . . . subtle.

Stella: it's all in the cropping.

Melanie: Well, why don’t we see if you have enough going on to support a blog and in the meantime if you have something you want to post, you can put it on my blog.

Stella: oh . . . okay. but you know what?

Melanie: What?

Stella: i think i have greatness in me.

Melanie: It may be that you do, little cat. It may be that you do.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

that explains so much

I hesitate to share this, I'm not usually the sharing kind, but I made a passing reference a while ago to some felonies that afflicted my family and then declined, somewhat unfairly, to elaborate, and a recent conversation with a friend reminded me that whenever I do elaborate, however haltingly, the response is usually “that explains so much” so I’ve decided to do that. Elaborate. Haltingly. Personally, I don’t know what these things “explain” – after all these years they remain mysterious to me, but here they are. Cue the violins.

When I was 5 or 7 (I don't remember which) I was molested by a stranger and testified about it. I think the testifying was worse than the assault. I have had PTSD for almost 50 years and have only recently begun to realize, first, that I have it, and second, the many ways that it has truncated and compromised my life.

When I was a freshman in college, my youngest aunt was in a bad marriage and wanted a divorce. Her husband had a different idea. While she and a friend were packing so she could leave the marriage, the husband came in and shot them both. She died, he survived. And, insult to woeful injury, the husband used my aunt’s credit card to buy the gun he killed her with so, of course, her estate — i.e., the family — received the bill for it. Tacky, tacky.

On Columbus Day weekend in 1976, my brother died in a drowning accident.

Sometime between my aunt being murdered and my brother’s inexplicable death, one of my cousins was beaten to death and no one was ever identified, arrested, or tried as the perpetrator.

In 1980, our tenant, a friend of the family for almost my entire life, was gang-raped, beaten with rocks, and left to die in the street. She somehow managed to crawl home and — after several hours of delay — my parents got the police to take her to a hospital, where she didn't die. The first thing she remembers about it is hearing “Let’s get the white bitch;” the last thing is “Let’s get out of here, man, she’s dead.” She didn't press charges, and she also has PTSD.

From about the time that I was 16 until Iwas 32 I had endometriosis, which meant that I spent 3 to 5 days out of every 28 on the floor waiting for the pain to stop. I had three surgeries for it. The third and last, a hysterectomy when I was 32, let me know what it was to be without physical pain or the constant anxiety of "how bad will it be this time?" I sent the surgeon flowers a year after the surgery. I have never been so grateful to anyone (outside of my family) in my life.

And generational things happened – in the 1980s many of my friends died of AIDS. So many that when one friend died of a simple heart attack I wasn't sure I’d heard correctly. But many people lost many people in the 80s.

An old friend was on the first plane that hit the World Trade Center. But, again, many people lost many people in the events of 9/11.

In 2007, as my father was dying, finally of his third cancer,
I took him off life support and stayed with him until he passed. This past spring, as my mother was dying of grief and age, I tried, but mostly failed, to give her a safe and comfortable passing.

People ask how I go on. I don’t know. Moment by moment, I suppose, like anyone else, and often not very well. I wake up. I’m not dead. So far, so good. I put on clothes. Feed the cats. Feed the birds. Go to work. Come home. Do it again the next day. Try, always try, to practice forgiveness and compassion. Forgiveness and compassion are difficult practices. Have a sense of proportion -- mine is still a middle-class American life, not subsistence (at best) in a Darfuri refugee camp.

I sometimes say, jokingly, that my family is like the Kennedys but without money or influence. Money and influence are, obviously, no safeguard against woe, but
I imagine they do assuage some aspects of this coarse and bumpy thing called living.

I don’t usually hold with dripping this all over people. It makes you feel bad and makes me feel no better. But there you have it. The things that explain so much.

Moving on, now.